About a week ago, one of my fish gave birth. So now there are about 20 baby fish (called fry) in my 10 gallon tank.
Here is a video of them at one week old eating (warning: very boring).
Also, for Ted and Toto, note that the background in the back left corner is a cover of Science. I plan on filling the rest of the background with science magazine covers that look "natural."
Showing posts with label babies. Show all posts
Showing posts with label babies. Show all posts
Sunday, February 6, 2011
Monday, November 9, 2009
Maddie the Baby doesn't want a public option
Congressmen Shadegg (R-AZ 3rd) brings his staffer's baby onto the House floor to tell the Congress what she thinks about health care reform. She has an incredibly precocious, well-formed opinion.
Is it just me or is she actually trying to keep congressman Shadegg from speaking into the microphone?
I wonder how she'll feel fifteen years from now when she learns she debated health care on the floor of the U.S. House of Representatives when she was 7 months old. I think I'd feel a little bit humbled and incredibly weirded out.
Is it just me or is she actually trying to keep congressman Shadegg from speaking into the microphone?
I wonder how she'll feel fifteen years from now when she learns she debated health care on the floor of the U.S. House of Representatives when she was 7 months old. I think I'd feel a little bit humbled and incredibly weirded out.
Wednesday, August 26, 2009
Where does your name rank?
The Social Security Administration has come out with its list of the most popular baby names from last year.
Theodore is 295th with a tad over a thousand more of us born last year.
Some cool, interesting, or displeasurable (IMHO) names that I noticed on the list:
Maximilian - 300th for boys (There's actually a lot of baller names starting with Maxi-)
Junior (that's sad) - 637th
Remington - 721st (321 boys - I hope at least one of them is a Steele)
Augustus - 795th
Leonidas - 883rd
Jagger - 954th (also would go well with Steele)
Genesis (really?) - 95th for girls
Serenity (eww) - 111th
Harmony (again...) - 314th
Ximena - 332nd (never even heard it before, should I have?)
Liberty - 620th
Precious - 791st (My PRECIOUS!!!)
Charity - 793rd
Xiomara - 805th (never heard of this one either)
Chastity - 956th (a good idea, but we'll see how it works out in 16 years)
Why do people feel so compelled to name their little girls after concepts of which they are vaguely supportive?
Theodore is 295th with a tad over a thousand more of us born last year.
Some cool, interesting, or displeasurable (IMHO) names that I noticed on the list:
Maximilian - 300th for boys (There's actually a lot of baller names starting with Maxi-)
Junior (that's sad) - 637th
Remington - 721st (321 boys - I hope at least one of them is a Steele)
Augustus - 795th
Leonidas - 883rd
Jagger - 954th (also would go well with Steele)
Genesis (really?) - 95th for girls
Serenity (eww) - 111th
Harmony (again...) - 314th
Ximena - 332nd (never even heard it before, should I have?)
Liberty - 620th
Precious - 791st (My PRECIOUS!!!)
Charity - 793rd
Xiomara - 805th (never heard of this one either)
Chastity - 956th (a good idea, but we'll see how it works out in 16 years)
Why do people feel so compelled to name their little girls after concepts of which they are vaguely supportive?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)